By- Vikalp Sharma Media is the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and thatโs power because they control the minds of the masses. -Malcolm X Introduction The issue based on the media trial which is talked about by numerous Civil Rights…
Read more MEDIA TRIAL: A LEGAL DILEMMA
By: Ishita Pancholi and Vikalp Sharma Introduction Plea Bargaining is a negotiation or arrangement between the accused and the prosecutor during which the accused confesses and approves to plead guilty for some concessions in his punishment. When a prosecutor has a solid case against the accused then the prosecutor may offer him the plea deal…
Read more PLEA BARGAINING: THE CATHOLICON FOR INDIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
By- Vikap Sharma Shreya Singhal v. Union of India AIR 2015 SC 1523 In this era of the Internet, people across the world have moved towards technology which has led them to use the Internet for a vast amount of time. Internet helps people disseminate the data on the social platform which within a fraction…
Read more SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT ON SECTION 66A OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS
By-Ishita Pancholi JUDGEMENT DATE: 14/08/2020 JUDGES: R. Subhash Reddy, J. Facts & Issues The land admeasuring 36 bighas 11 Biswas had a place with Gaon Sabha Luhar Heri, Delhi. The enormous degree of land in the village, including the previously mentioned land, was obtained by the Government by starting procedures under the Land Acquisition Act,…
Read more UNION OF INDIA & ANR. V. M/S. K.C. SHARMA AND CO. & ORS.
By-Ishita Pancholi JUDGEMENT DATE: 11/08/2020 JUDGES: Justices RD Dhanuka & Surendra Tavade Facts As indicated by the prosecution, on Nov 10, 1993, a resident of Nhava Sheva in Uran found an infant girl child abandoned near Sheva transport stand and took the baby to his home. The family at that point reported the issue to…
Read more KAMLABAI TUKARAM GHARAT V. THE STATE OF MAHARASTRA
By-Ishita Pancholi JUDGES: Bharati Dangre J ORDER DATE: 10/08/2020 Facts As indicated by the victim who filed a complaint in January this year, she came to be in contact with the applicant by means of Facebook and she uploaded her portable number on the Facebook Account. The applicant reached her and there used to visit…
Read more ATAULLAH FAKRUDDIN ANSARI V. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
By- Ishita Pancholi Case Name: HARI KRISHNA MANDIR TRUST V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.[1] Judgement Date: 07/08/2020 Judges: Indu Malhotra & Indira Banerjee JJ. Facts The trust, had filed an application in which it mentioned the State Government to address an inappropriate section or entry (as the inner road to the Trust) for the…
Read more HARI KRISHNA MANDIR TRUST V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
By- Ishita Pancholi Case Name: RAMA NAND AND ORS. V. THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.[1] Judgement Date: 06/08/2020 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., Ajay Rastogi J. and Aniruddha Bose J. Facts The dispute under the case is with respect to the understanding of an Office Memorandum presenting an Assured Career…
Read more RAMA NAND AND ORS. V. THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
By- Ishita Pancholi Case Name: NAHAS V. STATE OF KERALA Judgement Date: 03/07/2020 Judges: Justice PV Kunhikrishnan Facts Under this case, the accused battled that on the off chance that he filed a Bail Application under the Magistrate Court under Section 7(c), there is each opportunity to remand him by the Magistrate in light of…
Read more NAHAS V. STATE OF KERALA