By- Anjanee Goel Section 11 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 talks about identical or similar marks. It states that if a new trademark that has come to the registrar for registration is similar to an already registered trademark then in that case that new trademark cannot be registered. A trademark is still considered to be…
Read more IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR MARKS UNDER THE TRADEMARKS ACT, 1999
By- Vikap Sharma Shreya Singhal v. Union of India AIR 2015 SC 1523 In this era of the Internet, people across the world have moved towards technology which has led them to use the Internet for a vast amount of time. Internet helps people disseminate the data on the social platform which within a fraction…
By-Ishita Pancholi JUDGES: Bharati Dangre J ORDER DATE: 10/08/2020 Facts As indicated by the victim who filed a complaint in January this year, she came to be in contact with the applicant by means of Facebook and she uploaded her portable number on the Facebook Account. The applicant reached her and there used to visit…
Read more ATAULLAH FAKRUDDIN ANSARI V. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
By- Ishita Pancholi Case Name: HARI KRISHNA MANDIR TRUST V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.[1] Judgement Date: 07/08/2020 Judges: Indu Malhotra & Indira Banerjee JJ. Facts The trust, had filed an application in which it mentioned the State Government to address an inappropriate section or entry (as the inner road to the Trust) for the…
Read more HARI KRISHNA MANDIR TRUST V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
By- Ishita Pancholi Case Name: RAMA NAND AND ORS. V. THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.[1] Judgement Date: 06/08/2020 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., Ajay Rastogi J. and Aniruddha Bose J. Facts The dispute under the case is with respect to the understanding of an Office Memorandum presenting an Assured Career…
Read more RAMA NAND AND ORS. V. THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
By- Ishita Pancholi Judgement Date: 05/08/2020 Judges: Justice Dipankardatta and Justice A.S. Gadkari Facts It has been expressed by the applicant that the Respondent No. 1 and Respondent No.2 have been expanding the electricity bills in the midst of the current situation that has been made by the pandemic. The Respondents have cautioned the Petitioners…
Read more MANGAL PRABHAT LODHE V. MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY AND OTHERS
By- Ishita Pancholi Case Name: NAHAS V. STATE OF KERALA Judgement Date: 03/07/2020 Judges: Justice PV Kunhikrishnan Facts Under this case, the accused battled that on the off chance that he filed a Bail Application under the Magistrate Court under Section 7(c), there is each opportunity to remand him by the Magistrate in light of…
